Aligning Adaptation to Real Rates of Change

imgres-1If we can point to a moment when educators finally realized that the world was changing so dramatically that we had to take notice, it was within a year or so of the publication of Thomas Friedman’s The World is Flat.  Friedman has a remarkable ability to take something complex that many of us know to be true, and illuminate it in ways that are timely, concrete, and intellectually accessible.  I am a few chapters into his newest book, Thank You For Being Late, and this is just the first of what I know will be several posts as I try to summarize key points within the language and relevancy context of K-12 education.

Friedman’s central thesis is that the rate of change in three key areas–technology, global markets, and climate change– have overwhelmed our ability to adapt in ways that have worked for human individuals and institutions for past millennia.  He shares in detail a conversation with Eric Teller, CEO of Google’s X research and development lab.  Teller outlines the difference in rate of change of “scientific progress” (which includes but is not solely based on what we think of as “technology”), and “the rate at which humanity–individuals and society–adapts to changes in the environment”.  I have stolen the simple figure that Teller drew for Friedman:

screen-shot-2016-12-01-at-8-53-08-am

The dot Teller places on the graph, “we are here”, represents the fact that “the rate of technological change is now accelerating so fast that it has risen above the average rate at which most people can absorb all these changes. Many of us cannot keep pace anymore.”

Within the context of Friedman’s thesis, the exponential curve is not just technology, but a combination of scientific advances, changes in global economic relationships, and climate changes that, regardless of Luddite opposition to evidence of the cause, are occurring at an ever-increasing pace.  This point of “where we are” is a perfect description of the dissonance facing many, if not most, educators today.  The institutions of “school”, and the skills in which most educators have been trained, are inadequate to keep pace with the changes around us.  It creates what Teller calls “cultural angst”, leaving us feeling, as Friedman says, “disoriented”.

This is why I have preached that schools need to acquire both the comfort and capacity to deal with change. We have the tool kit to get beyond the angst and disorientation so we can embrace, rather than fear the inevitable, particularly as the curve of environmental change is getting ever steeper. School leaders need to acquire and provide that took kit for their organizations. The only alternatives are these: an ever increasing drag of angst and disorientation, or a failure of the school, either locally and/or systemically.  Both of those futures are bleak, but both are completely realistic if we fail to embed in our systems the ability to align the curve of human adaptability to the curve of change in the world around us. We know the tools we need; they are within our grasp.  We CAN change angst and disorientation to enthusiasm and opportunity…but it takes some work.

More later as I progress through the book!

4 thoughts on “Aligning Adaptation to Real Rates of Change

  1. Gordie Hess

    Read the World is Flat courtesy of our financial planner, I will have to pick up Friedmans new book. Vegetating here in Arizona, I need all the intellectual stimulation I can find and handle. Problem with reading is staying awake!

    Luckily I have good contacts with many younger nephews and nieces who happily remind me of what a luddite I have become and though their eyes I can see the changes, that although I am tempted to condemn or deny, I find I must face and encompass.
    By the way, we have moved from our Eagan home and live full time at the lake, at least during the non-freezing months. Post labor day is a great time to visit MN. I will contact you if we make a trip to CA this winter to visit the family that remains in SoCal.

    Reply
  2. Deb Chickadel

    At University Child Development School, a PK-5th grade independent school in Seattle Washington, we often have great conversations amongst faculty and with students about the dissonance in learning. We often talk about being uncomfortable and that making mistakes and having disequilibrium are a natural part of the process when growing. I’m excited to look into this book because it mirrors this idea that we talk about in education as central. As a faculty we strive in our conversations and in our planning to make sure we remain responsive and have the “comfort and capacity to deal with change.” Each year we talk about technology and where we are and where we dream to be. Since I’ve been a teacher at UCDS we have gone from whiteboard markers to Smartboards and Google Drive. The ability to plan together and function as a cohesive and stronger team has greatly increased. Thanks for pointing me towards this author. I look forward to reading more and thinking more about the continual challenge of being adaptable.

    Deb Chickadel
    Pre-K/K Teacher
    UCDS
    Seattle, WA

    Reply
    1. Grant Post author

      Thanks, Deb! So many good things going on at UCDS; I need an excuse to fly up there and visit you folks. One comment: it is always easiest to see changes in terms of technology, when really the greatest change taking place, and required at good schools, is a shift in culture and mindset. Technology enables us to do some things we could not do in the past, but unless we have the fertile ground of culture and mindset, those seeds don’t produce valuable fruit. Appreciate you sharing!

      Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *